1/4/2023 0 Comments Anychart dial animation![]() ![]() ![]() Anychart dial animation software#If using it as a collaboration tool, treat it as licensed software with minimal branding customization. I think we can all agree that pretty much all content management systems are crippled, but at least you’ll be able to customize the entire experience - interaction, design, markup, and so forth. In summary, if your organization plans to use SharePoint 2007 primarily as a CMS, evaluate it as you would any other CMS. Anychart dial animation skin#It’s still possible to skin the interface using CSS overrides, but not to the extent which we were customizing it. This inevitably begs the question: Is SharePoint completely unskinnable when used as a collaboration tool? No. The ensuing deep dive into customizing images and markup for our team sites led to an unsuccessful skinning effort that was eventually scrapped. No one ever made the above distinction, and thus “Hawaiian Airlines did it, so can we!” became our rally cry, not realizing the difference between CMS skinning and collaboration skinning. Because your skinning won’t be reflected in the admin, what should otherwise be a continuous visual flow for users instead becomes a jarring transition from your beautiful theme to SharePoint’s vanilla theme and back again. ![]() However, in the collaboration scenario, nearly any user can, and will, switch between published screens and admin screens to complete tasks. (See comments #56 and on from the original post for more info.) This is all perfectly fine in the CMS scenario, as only an infinitesimal fraction of your users will switch between published screens and admin screens. Apparently this is intentional, but I consider it a major UI flaw. templates for the CMS) will not carry over to the admin screens. Here’s where things fall apart: Any changes made to Master Pages (i.e. In reality, nearly every user can simultaneously be a site owner and consumer of content. The most common of these is probably “team sites.” In this scenario, you have many site owners accessing admin screens. It can facilitate the many activities common to any workplace - intranets, document sharing and versioning, project tracking, and much more. In this scenario, typically one or very few individuals access admin screens, while the majority of users merely consume published content.Ĭomplementary to its core, SharePoint is a massive collaboration tool. One site referenced often throughout our initial skinning effort was the public site for Hawaiian Airlines, powered by SharePoint. Just about any flavor of web content can be built and maintained by it - public or internal, small scale or large. However, try to use it as both in a single implementation and you’ll entangle yourself in a strenuous skinning effort.Īt its core, SharePoint is a robust content management system (CMS). There is a fundamental distinction that must be understood when implementing SharePoint: SharePoint can be used primarily as a CMS or primarily as a collaboration tool. Given the amount of exposure my original article garnered, I feel obligated to share what I’ve learned since. Well, it turns out SharePoint 2007 isn’t nearly as customizable as I (and others) were led to believe. Remember all that clamor about skinning SharePoint with standards? SharePoint 2007: Pointedly unskinnable ~ 24 October 2007 ~ ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |